Go Back   Techgage.com > Site HQ > Reviews and Articles

Reviews and Articles Discussion for Techgage content is located here. Only staff can create topics, but everyone is welcome to post.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-17-2006, 12:21 AM   #1
Default AMD M2.. What We Know So Far

There has not been that much info released about the AM2 yet, but there is enough to cover. Will this be a CPU that we should wait for before building another system? Let's take a look at what we know so far and see.

Please feel free to comment on the article!
__________________

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz, ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, OCZ 8GB PC2-6400, EVGA GTX 285 1024MB
Seagate 500GB, 750GB & 1TB, Pioneer 22x ODD, Corsair 1000HX, Thermalright Ultra-120, CM Storm Sniper
Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Ultrasone PRO 750, Gentoo Linux (KDE 4.3.2, 2.6.31 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter

Profiles: Last.fm | Xbox Live | Steam
Rob Williams is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2006, 02:22 PM   #2
Default

"The problem is, it appears much larger than current brackets on any motherboard, which is odd because the CPU size has not changed in the least. So is this to say that the AM2 will generate that much more heat, that we will need massive new coolers to accommodate them?"

the new bracket is most likely intended for better mechanical stability over the horrible design that's currently in use.
__________________
Owner of EclipseOC

In the overclocking game he who tries the most things wins
(cf)Eclipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 10:56 AM   #3
Default

Argh - what to do...have the upgrade "itch" to AMD dual core but not sure if I should wait for M2. I'm afraid M2's are going to be insanely expensive - including the DDR2 prices on launch.
Meerkat154 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 01:14 PM   #4
Default

If you need a computer now, I wouldn't bother waiting. DDR2 modules are generally more expensive, and I could see the CPU's costing a pretty penny off the get go.
__________________

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz, ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, OCZ 8GB PC2-6400, EVGA GTX 285 1024MB
Seagate 500GB, 750GB & 1TB, Pioneer 22x ODD, Corsair 1000HX, Thermalright Ultra-120, CM Storm Sniper
Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Ultrasone PRO 750, Gentoo Linux (KDE 4.3.2, 2.6.31 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter

Profiles: Last.fm | Xbox Live | Steam
Rob Williams is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2006, 06:20 PM   #5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob Williams
There has not been that much info released about the AM2 yet, but there is enough to cover. Will this be a CPU that we should wait for before building another system? Let's take a look at what we know so far and see.

Please feel free to comment on the article!
No offense but there is a great deal of errors in that article.

#1 Amps/current has increased some ~33%, with voltage. Therefor the TDPs do not change significantally (similar to the change from AXP to A64)

#2 DDR2-800 has been officially supported by intel since the i955XBX, however DDR2-1066 has not (other than Asus on the XEs)

#3 The bracket was changed not due to larger coolers per-say but re-directing *where* the pressure is applied to the chip to make it a more even contact area (changing the plane from 2 --> 4 points)

Finally there should be a significant clock increase comparable to what we saw Prescott do on LGA775 because of the far superior power filtration systems in place. 3ghz+ will happen on 90nm (as a rated speed)
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2006, 09:08 PM   #6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Finally there should be a significant clock increase comparable to what we saw Prescott do on LGA775 because of the far superior power filtration systems in place. 3ghz+ will happen on 90nm (as a rated speed)
maybe, but it won't happen right off the bat

also, the RATED current the socket and power subsystem has to provide is going up from what i can tell, not the actual power draw of the cpu's. big difference.

the clock speed bump we saw with socketT was primarily from the new revision core, not from the socket change itself. the timing of the two was convenient afaict
__________________
Owner of EclipseOC

In the overclocking game he who tries the most things wins
(cf)Eclipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 11:39 AM   #7
Default

The prices of S939 cpus has steadily declined. I would either wait a month or two and scoop up a cheap S939, or just go ahead and buy now. S939 will still be viable for years to come. Most of us that have them now have not tapped their full potential. You really cannot lose by sticking to them. I personally am planning on an X2 very soon. The prices have come down quite a bit.
__________________
Gigabyte GA45 UD3P/E7200
Mushkin HP2-6400 2X1GB
Sapphire HD 4830 512MB X 2 w/Dell 2407WFP-HC
OCZ ModXstream 600W PSU
Creative X-FI Fagtality w/Sony 5.1 and Technics 300W Amp and 3 way towers
Seagate 7200.11 1TB w/Vista Premium Ultimate 64
b1lk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 02:52 PM   #8
Default

Well based on the sample reviews I would have to say wait to get an AM2 system. I want to see benches with DDR2-800 since the samples can only use DDR2-667. Still even eith DDR2-800 I doubt there will be a huge difference in performance. I will stil with S939 for a while.
__________________
Chuck Norris doesn't go hunting.... CHUCK NORRIS GOES KILLING
werty316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2006, 04:59 PM   #9
Default

I guess Kingston and Corsair are the only companies with DDR2-1000 on the market at this point in time. 500Mhz wow that is just some crazy stuff these days. is DDR3 going to bring 1600Mhz? 2000Mhz????
__________________
Thanks

Sledgehammer70

www.bfmetournaments.com
www.mandmcr.com
Sledgehammer70 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2006, 11:53 PM   #10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by (cf)Eclipse
"The problem is, it appears much larger than current brackets on any motherboard, which is odd because the CPU size has not changed in the least. So is this to say that the AM2 will generate that much more heat, that we will need massive new coolers to accommodate them?"

the new bracket is most likely intended for better mechanical stability over the horrible design that's currently in use.

quad core heat dispersal???
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 10:51 PM   #11
Thumbs up AMD64 3200+ AM2(940 pin) DDR2 533mhz MSI...GR8888

go and buy AMD64 3200+ AM2(940 pin), DDR2 533mhz, MSI NVIDA chipset mother board, really gr8 performance,...no problems installing windows,redhat, fedora linux...really gr88 performance,pc is so cool,supports multi threading... no need to go for intel core2 duo ( its just a 32bit processor no 64bit)., go for AMD athlon 64 AM2 (supports ddr2)-->>>gr8 bandwidth...gr8 performance...price is low too...he he

bye
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2007, 11:47 PM   #12
Default

Unfortunately, it's projected that the quad-core AMD processors are going to need a different socket entirely. They'll be transitioning from pins to a Land Grid Array design, like Intel's socket 775.
__________________
Rory Buszka
Rory Buszka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2007, 12:16 AM   #13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taterworks View Post
They'll be transitioning from pins to a Land Grid Array design, like Intel's socket 775.
Yes that is what will happen... and for good reason. I can't recount how many times I've bent pins on my 939 :-|
__________________

Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.20GHz, ASUS P5K Premium WiFi-AP, OCZ 8GB PC2-6400, EVGA GTX 285 1024MB
Seagate 500GB, 750GB & 1TB, Pioneer 22x ODD, Corsair 1000HX, Thermalright Ultra-120, CM Storm Sniper
Dell 2408WFP 24", ASUS Xonar Essence STX, Ultrasone PRO 750, Gentoo Linux (KDE 4.3.2, 2.6.31 Kernel)

"Take care to get what you like, or you will be forced to like what you get!" - H.P. Baxxter

Profiles: Last.fm | Xbox Live | Steam
Rob Williams is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2007, 03:48 AM   #14
Default

Yup. My good friend was more than happy to make an ornament out of my CPUs with bent pins -_-;
__________________
Attorney #1: I stepped on a baby bird this morning on the way into the courthouse.
Attorney #2: The jokes are right. We don't have souls.


"Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn't do than by the ones you did do."
~ Mark Twain. Many may say something like it, but few act upon it. Woe unto them.
Bobbythecat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2007, 06:16 PM   #15
Default

I've never bent a pin of any of the chips I've owned, unless I wanted to. How'd you manage to do that? I've bent fins on heatsinks, broken components on video cards, dropped hard drives on fans, but I've never bent a pin on a cpu before.
__________________
AMD Opteron 150@2.9Ghz 1.5v|DFI Lanparty Expert 4/06 Bios|OCZ Gold OCZ4002048ELGEGXT-K 2x1024 242Mhz 3v|Twin eVga 7800GTs 470/1100
If you have a large quantity of Hot Pockets building up, you simply aren't eating them fast enough.- dibene | Chaos Havok: grrrr im lagging me My Pics
Jakal is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
None

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005 - 2009, Techgage Networks Inc.